 | | |
| Economic Facts and Fallacies | 
 enlarge | Author: Thomas Sowell
Publisher: Basic Books
Category: Book
List Price: $26.00
Buy New: $14.75
You Save: $11.25 (43%)
Buy New/Used from $14.75
Avg. Customer Rating:  (55 reviews)
Sales Rank: 902
Languages: German (Original Language), English (Unknown), English (Published)
Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 272
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9
Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 6.2 x 0.9
ISBN: 0465003494
Dewey Decimal Number: 330
EAN: 9780465003495
ASIN: 0465003494
Publication Date: December 31, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Solid and Interesting September 11, 2008
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
Many of the economic facts in his book contradict conventional wisdom and are somewhat counter-intuitive, but you cannot deny the facts and it makes me realize how little I really understand about economics.
In this election year it is interesting about how much bad economic policy is being spewed out by politicians on both sides of the aisle. Every politician should read this book....however, good economic policy is rarely popular since in many cases it is counter-intuitive.
Pete.
 Almost mesmerizing September 6, 2008
3 out of 6 found this review helpful
Because Dr. Sowell writes so very well it is easy to get swept up in his arguments. And because he is so edifying even to those with some expertise in economics, it is easy for us to put aside our critical faculties and go blithely along without noticing some unstated assumptions and what he leaves out.
Underlying Sowell's approach to economics are two main assumptions:
One, when it comes to humans, more is good. Conservatives tend to believe this because they fear that stagnant or shrinking populations will lead to stagnant or depressed economic growth.
Two, problems of depleted resources can be solved by human ingenuity. Essentially this is the position championed by the late Julian Simon who espoused a belief in endless resources and unlimited population growth made possible by scientific and technological progress. What this approach to economics ignores is quality of life and the cost to future generations.
In the chapter on "Urban Facts and Fallacies," Sowell criticizes "smart growth" laws, "open space" laws, eminent domain laws, and other restrictions placed on development by cities and counties. He demonstrates that such actions raise the price of existing housing while preventing developers from building more housing. Consequently, the average person can't afford to buy a house in places like San Francisco, Monterey or San Mateo counties in California, or Montgomery County in Maryland and elsewhere. On page 26 he gives the contrary example of Houston, Texas which "does not even have zoning laws, much less the array of severe housing restrictions found in some other cities." On the next page he notes "severe building restrictions began in" Palo Alto, California during the 1970s, "but not in Las Vegas, where builders could simply construct new homes as the demand for housing increased."
In addition to asking rhetorically "Where would you rather live?" I would note that it is normal and historically sanctioned for people to protect the value of their property by preventing the growth of anything nearby that might lower that value. What Sowell is really objecting to is the influence of property owners on local governments. I don't know where Sowell lives, but I doubt if he would be pleased with the construction of a Soviet-style high rise housing development next door. Indeed I think he would use whatever political influence he has to prevent such a development.
The chapter on "Racial Facts and Fallacies" is fascinating and Sowell makes some excellent points. He rejects the idea that the reason for poverty in black ghettos is the "legacy of slavery." He shows statistically that things have gotten worse over time in black neighborhoods rather than better as we have gotten more removed from the time of slavery. What he doesn't do is account for this other than to note that fatherless families living on welfare produce children that do not do well economically. The implication might be that, well, they're black and not made of quite the right stuff. Sowell doesn't say this. Instead he blames "Southern culture" as he contrasts the attainment and quality of life of northern blacks with that of both whites and blacks from the South. He writes, "the regional culture of the South existed in particular regions of Britain in centuries past, regions where people destined to settle in the American South exhibited the same behavior patterns before they immigrated to the South. They were called 'crackers' and 'rednecks' before they crossed the Atlantic--and before they ever saw a slave." (pp. 165-166)
The hard-to-escape implication is that ultimately it is the inheritance of some kind of British subculture that is continuing to hold Afro-Americans down. This conclusion is further developed on page 187 where Sowell writes, "What lower-class white communities in Britain and black ghettoes in the United States have in common is a pattern of social pathologies that became pronounced in the latter half of the twentieth century, when similar ideas and polices became dominant in both countries." He concludes vaguely: "In both countries, politicians, activists, and ideologues who claimed to have solutions instead made many problems worse than before." Somehow I doubt that he was thinking about the leadership of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, although this nebulous statement doesn't rule that out!
Sowell points out that there is a whole lot of land in this world that is not developed. He notes (p. 10) that "more than nine-tenths of the land" in the United States "remains undeveloped." What he glosses over is the fact that the land that is developed is the best land, and that much of the undeveloped land cannot at present be profitably developed. Again in the conservative economic mindset there are always more resources to be developed by clever and industrious humans. Indeed, one cannot help but think that Sowell in particular believes that poverty is the end result of unclever and unindustrious humans. Again and again he points to great economic advances made by some particular group--the Chinese in Singapore, the Jews in New York, the Germans in Argentina, etc. And in this he is undoubtedly right. Indeed, this is one aspect of conservative economic thought that I find irrefutable.
Another major detriment to economic well being, as Sowell notes again and again, are corrupt and lawless governments. He cites many examples around the world demonstrating this truth.
Less convincing is his argument that slavery came first and racism later as a justification for slavery. (See page 162.) True, slavery is thousands of years old, but xenophobia, which is at the heart of racism, is even older. Furthermore it is easier to take and keep slaves that are of a different color or culture than that of the slave holders, both psychologically and as a practical matter. The man of color stands out in a white community, and a blue-eyed European would be conspicuous in ancient Egypt.
Having said all this I want to emphasize that this is an excellent book by a distinguished economist well worth the reading.
Economic Facts and Fallacies August 28, 2008
3 out of 5 found this review helpful
Excellent read. Thomas Sowell has done it again. He takes beliefs many of us have about economics and proves just how wrong these beliefs are. This should be required reading for high school as well as college. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in economics.
Review of Economic Facts & Fallacies August 12, 2008
3 out of 5 found this review helpful
As always, Dr. Thomas Sowell has written yet another clear, incisive and illuminating book. His gift for explaining complex things in an easily understood manner is again on display.
There is no better way to learn and appreciate economics than to buy and read every Thomas Sowell book you can find. I regard him as the most insightful writer and teacher I have ever found. He is a national and an international treasure.
Great book, but at least 1 contradiction August 11, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
A very good book, does a great job of pointing out many fallacies that circulate in the USA. But I was disappointed in his citing of black "family incomes" below the poverty line in chapter 6. The statistics he cites in this chapter to show that the civil rights movement had a small influence in black poverty contradicts his discussion in chapter 5 about income fallacies, specifically the use of "Household income" to demonstrate a lack of income improvement among the poor. That contradiction stuck out to me like a sore thumb! Otherwise, a very enlightening book!
|
|
|
Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| | |